Manflu: a new twist to the debate

Manflu is one of the not so hardy perennials of domestic debate. Are men justified in claiming unlimited sympathy when they retire to bed with flu on the grounds that they actually suffer more than their wives or partners or is this self-serving myth? The dispute has even popped up as part of the ongoing Guardian vs. Mail sniping. Several years ago the Mail ran a story about an immune system study, claiming it showed manflu was real because of evidence that males had feebler immune systems.

Ben Goldacre and the NHS choices site rubbished the story on the grounds that it involved GM mice who had been infected with bacteria – rather a virus – and very few humans had the gene involved anyway. So no excuses for burrowing under the duvet.

Today there’s a story of mine in the Daily Mail that updates the male/female immune differences saga and reveals an intriguing twist to it.

About these ads

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 851 other followers

%d bloggers like this: