Secret Carbs committee that could cause a disaster

If you’re familiar with the low carbohydrate, Atkins-type diet – variously known as the paleo diet, the Zone diet, the South Beach diet or the ketogenic diet- you are probably also aware that it is pretty controversial. So is it a great way to lose weight and improve your metabolism or is it lacking in nutrients and dangerous?

 We should have a clear idea by now because it’s been around for over 20 years and has a growing number of supporters, not least because it holds out the possibility of being a radical new treatment for various chronic disorders including cancer. So you might think that the authorities who have been promoting the high carb low fat approach for years would be putting some serious research into finding out if and when going low carbs can be beneficial because the low fat diet is obviously not the panacea for weight loss and protecting the heart it was claimed to be.

Now thanks to a very bright one-time corporate lawyer Hannah Sutter we know that there is a deeply obscure government committee called SACN which has been working away for five years to decide just how much carbohydrate we should be getting. Unfortunately what she has discovered is far from reassuring. In fact it is alarming, depressing but horribly predictable.

After forensically burrowing through the committee’s minutes and documentation she has compiled a report that shows the committee is packed with vested interests, doesn’t have the experts that are vital to making any sort of assessment of how much carbs we need and prone to the most basic errors that suggests its members aren’t even up to speed on the basics of carbohydrate metabolism.

Figures that point to low fat failure

What this means is that next year when it is due to report it is highly unlikely to recommend very much in the way of a change current dietary advice. This is disastrous since putting everyone on a low fat diet can hardly be counted as a success either in terms of weight loss or health. Back in the early 1970’s when low fat promotion was just beginning, people in the UK were eating nearly 3000 calories a day on average and just under 3% of men and women were obese.

But by 1999, after nearly 30 years of this advice and with supermarket shelves stacked with low fat products, obesity rates had shot up to 22.6% of men and 25.8% of women. But at the same time we were eating nearly half the number of calories just 1,690 per day.Meanwhile diabetes rates had soared as well. Clearly the simplistic official notion of how calories and weight are related, which lies at the heart of the low fat recommendation, was badly wrong.

So a sensible assessment of the different and complex ways carbohydrates can affect our metabolism and how they interact with fat and protein is very much overdue. However without a major overhaul of the committee this is not going to happen at SACN. Read the full story here

Advertisements

Comments

  1. Barbara Lombert says:

    Some very interesting stuff on diet and particularly carbs came out of the recent gluten summit which you would have done well to tune into Jerome, and Hannah Sutter as well. It was run by Dr Tom O’Bryan, http://www.theglutensummit.com. There were many interviews with specialists on the subject of gluten and gluten based carbs, gluten sensitivity and its influence in terms of inflammatory diseases
    of the brain, and how it impacts on the heart and cardiovascular system. That of course discussed fats and sugar. They also included Dash2, Paleo and GAPS diets etc. Specialists included Mark Houston, Liz Lipski, David Perlmutter and Cynthis Kupper.

  2. http://healthinsightuk.org/2013/11/28/sacn-or-sack-em-the-committee-thats-confused-about-carbs/ works fine for me – no Norton crapware here though.

    SACN have said some sensible things along the way, but there is always the “must add up to 100%” problem where the lipophobes will present a substantial barrier to reducing carbohydrate recommendations. In effect carbs are the “what’s left to make 100%” of the nutritional balance.

  3. Please be advised every time I try to go to Hannah’s piece it is blocked by Norton – deliberate or accidently I don’t know but you need to sort it!! thanks Morwenna

    • Thanks for letting us know. Will check it out. Any more information be useful. You could try putting healthinsightuk.org directly into a search engine. The article is on the home page

  4. It seems nothing has changed since the days of John Yudkin in the ’70s. Despite the huge amount of scientifically validated evidence coming out of the Microbiome project that this high carb diet approach and processed foods is literally killing us through disease.

Leave a reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: